|
|
Motorcycles for Alpine Riding
by Rob Beach
Daily we speak with North American riders about touring in
Europe. The conversation naturally comes around to the
motorcycles themselves, and what type of machine is desired on
tour. The sort of things we hear regularly are:
"I have ridden in the Rockies and the Appalachians on my
'Wing (or Dresser, or LT, or...) and I had no problems. A tour
in the Alps will simply not be palatable for me or my
passenger without the type of bike I ride here."
"I need a big machine
for my passenger's comfort."
"A full fairing is a
must - I hate to be beaten to death by the wind."
"The bike must have a
backrest. We simply can't ride two up without a backrest."
"I need a shorter bike,
so that I can get both feet on the ground."
|
 |
|
A small Alpine Road.
Is this the place for your Goldwing? |
For most North American riders, a ride in the European Alps
is a dream tour.
For a dream tour the general thought is that one should have a
dream motorcycle – a big, comfortable bike for you and your
passenger, a grand ride for a grand trip.
Europe in general, and the Alps in particular, will be the
most challenging motorcycle ride many riders ever take. The
challenges particular to the Alps may be summed up with two
words – tight, and small.
"I have ridden... and
can do the Alps on that same type of bike."
There are few roads in the United States that can be used
as a comparison to Alpine roads. Deal's Gap? A great piece of
road to be sure, but a bit – no, make that a lot –
wider than some of the neatest Alpine roads.
Do you ride many roads without shoulders (paved, or unpaved)?
Few roads in the Alps have shoulders, and those that do are
almost all in Switzerland. Often there isn't space for two
individual lanes, much less a shoulder.
Imagine taking every turn on "the Gap" (they keep
telling me that is one of America's premier roads) and
decreasing the radius by 60% or so. Its' getting rather tight,
no? With that modification, it is getting closer to a
road in the Alps!
|
 |
|
A turn posing as a
hairpin. |
Here is a photo of a hairpin - a nice, tight corner of the
type encounted in the Alps. Imagine crossing 3 or 4 mountain
passroads daily, and encountering between 15 and 40 of this
type of turn on each side of each pass.
There are other routes available – in some places.
Often, however, the only way from A to B is over
a pass, a road with 10, 15 or even 25° grades and heaps
of this sort of corner. One of the remarkable aspects of
riding in the Alps (in contrast to say, the Rockies) is that
you don't ride down a valley looking at the mountains, but you
crawl all over the mountain, spending lots of time
looking down at the valley!
|
 |
|
A real hairpin. |
Opps - did I actually caption that photo as "hairpin"? You
could park a car on the inside of that turn. My apologies...
that is not a hairpin, but (by European standards) a simple
180° corner. A real hairpin turns around a radius about
that of a coke can, and throws serious elevation change into
the equation. You may have noted that there is a radius
difference of about 15 feet between these two corners.
The road depicted in the 2nd image is a two way road. There
can be, and often is, traffic coming in the other direction.
"I need a big machine
for my passenger's comfort."
|
2007 BMW specs -
length & wheelbase |
|
|
RT |
R |
GS |
F650 |
|
Length (inches) |
87.8 |
84.4 |
87 |
85.6 |
|
Wheelbase (inches) |
58.4 |
58.9 |
59.8 |
58.2 |
|
Wet weight (lbs.) |
571 |
492 |
496 |
423 |
This comment is naturally followed by a request for an
R1200RT. While putting together the specifications for the
various bikes on these pages I was quite surprised to discover
that the wheelbase of the RT, (the biggest bike in our fleet),
and the F650 (the smallest fleet bike) differ by only
one-tenth of an inch! The RT is a larger bike than
the F650, to be sure. But the differences are in width, bulk,
and length over the back end of the bike, not in the
wheelbase.
In short, the RT is not inherently more comfortable because it
is bigger, as the "size" is largely a matter of perception. It
is heavier and offers less ground clearance than either the R
or GS. Both of these differences are liabilities in the
Alps.
"A full fairing is a
must - I hate to be beaten to death by the wind."
Ponder your average ride at home. Is it an hour or more at a
reasonably steady speed, say between 45 and 65 mph? Under
those circumstances, a fairing and windscreen add considerable
comfort to the ride. Sitting upright in even a 50 mph
windblast shortly becomes very tiring.
Fact: Your average moving speed over the course
of an Alpine Adventure will be under 35 mph. That will
be true if you are riding solo, and briskly all day
long. Simply puttering along, your average speed, over 2000
miles and two weeks of riding, will be under 30 mph. These
speeds are imposed by the roads traveled, not by us as guides
or tour operators.
On a Beach tour you will be encouraged to ride at your own
pace, on your own choice of itinerary. Yet even without
knowing you or how you ride, I stand by that statement.
At speeds as low as these, the fairing offers little, if any,
advantage. Rarely will you be traveling at speeds high enough
to take advantage of the excellent BMW aerodynamics.
When traveling on the German Autobahn or the Italian
Autostrade, the RT is the bike I choose. It is quite
comfortable on the highway, and at those higher speeds the
fairing makes the ride effortless. Even more fun is the
K1200RS, which simply howls down the autobahn.
|
 |
|
A series
of hairpins,
example #1 |
 |
A series of hairpins,
example #2 |
On tour (in the mountains) my last choice of a mount is the
RS, second last choice the RT. On the smaller roads the weight
and bulk of the RT means it must be horsed around corners and
it takes more effort to accelerate and decelerate. Riding it
takes quite a bit more effort than the R or GS.
You will find the roads themselves require substantially more
riding effort than you normally expend. Don't compound the
work by adding weight and bulk on the motorcycle. Small and
light is much easier to handle.
"The bike must have a
backrest. We simply can't ride two up without a backrest."
There are very few backrests seen on European bikes in the
mountains, in contrast to the states, where few touring
machines are without them. Many American riders are used to
motorcycles that are so big that there is room for a backrest
between the rider and passenger!
A passenger leaning on a backrest is a pendulum pivoting on
the seat of the bike, reacting to directional and speed
changes after the fact. A passenger in the proper position
(close in behind the rider, holding on to him/her)
participates at the moment.
This participation makes HUGE differences in the way the bike
handles, and also in the passenger comfort (really). But it is
also very different than the riding style we have become
accustom to in the states, with huge bikes, backrests for the
passenger AND rider, and a zillion miles of droning on the
highway.
Alpine riding is pure, active, you (and passenger)
got-to-pay-attention sort of riding. Backrests simply don't
fit into that equation, as they promote a much lazier form of
passengering.
Often the passenger feels uncomfortable because movements of
the bike surprise them. The rider's responsibility is to offer
notice of changes (via consistency in machine operation). In
reality, riders always send lots of signals that something is
about to happen. But with the passenger removed from the rider
those signals don't "jump the gap", and that equals a
surprised passenger.
Riders often use a backrest as a crutch. “My passenger feels
more secure with a backrest” can really mean “I am not a
smooth rider able to instill confidence in my passenger, but
the addition of a backrest makes her feel better.”
|
Togetherness |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
2 up on a big bike,
or a small bike, the proper riding position is
identical. |
A bit of a different approach to riding two-up will pay off
handsomely in the Alps. Having your passenger up close is
romantic, and, more importantly, allows the bike to work much
better in the zillions of corners you will encounter.
Becoming a more refined, smoother rider will also add to your
passenger's comfort.
Examine the two photos (Togetherness) of BMWs being ridden two
up.
Notice that the rider/passenger combination on the RT (“big
bike”) are “as one” as the couple on the F650 (“small bike”).
Toss the backrest and, after a day of adjustment, you, as
rider, will be MUCH happier. I guarantee it will seem as
though your riding skill has increased 25% - an active
passenger makes that much of a difference.
After all that is said, we are able to equip
your machine with a backrest - but do think long and hard
about it before having this crutch installed. The bike
will handle much better without it!
"I need a shorter bike,
so that I can get both feet on the ground."
I'll level with you - there is no place level in
the Alps. With parking lots built at an angle, roads cambered
in all sorts of directions, and elevation differences
everywhere, rarely is a rider able to stop with both feet on
the ground on anything but the very shortest bike.
Short bikes have ground clearance problems, and ground
clearance is critical on twisty Alpine roads. That is why you
don't see the R1200C in our fleet - it is simply too low for
twisty back-road riding.
|

|
|
Notice that my son
Jake's left foot is about 18" off the ground. He
actually can't even reach the left footpeg in this
position.
Ahh, a kid's confidence, eh? |
Learn to balance - really balance, in a way we
rarely have to here. Don't depend on having both feet on the
ground at one time. Motorcycling is about balance, and over
85% of the "accidents" we have on tour are simple tipovers,
caused by riders who don't have confidence in properly
balancing a bike, and who have come to depend on short bikes,
and both feet on the ground as their "landing gear."
Learn to stop - every time - with only one foot on the
ground. Passenger or no passenger, regardless of the road
surface, irrespective of the terrain - only one foot on the
ground. Then, you not only will be unfazed by the seat
height of the BMWs, but you will go home without paying me (or
another tour operator) a damage invoice for that silly tipover.
Can't do it, you say? Yes you can - Jake can, and he is only 9
years old. You can too. Believe in yourself!
And now, the tip promised ever so long ago:
Riders above 5'10" tall should look at the R1200GS - it is
the most versatile of BMW's line, and perfect for the Alpine
roads. Shorter riders should consider the R1200R or the
F800ST, as the GS
is a rather tall machine.
Competent, confident, well-balanced riders of shorter stature
will also find the GS to be enjoyable, albeit a bit more work
in the parking lot than the R.
Solo, or inseam challenged, riders should look at the F650GS
as an ideal ride. The power to weight ratio is very favorable,
the bike is quite narrow, and it is very easy to handle on the
Alpine roads. Repeat tour members riding solo often ask for
the F650 on their second trip. It took them 2 weeks of
exposure to understand Alpine roads, and the next time around
they realize that smaller & lighter really is better!
You are interested in a European tour because it is different,
it is challenging, and it is magical. Consider that the
differences encountered may be so big that different thinking,
and changes in habit may (will) be required. Habits such as
big bikes, backrests and big windscreens.
Now lets' get out and ride - really ride, as one
cannot in the states!
|
 |